I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was developing extra strain and was slower in comparison to the aged stuff. I don't remember if I even tried standard h4831 or not; I am pondering not.
They have executed identically for me. Like Anyone else I rushed to obtain the newer SC Model but have now switched back. Preferably you would like about one hundred% loading density. When you've got ample case capability with the H4831(long) you happen to be most likely better off.
The fact that the H4831 is certainly a slower burning powder is specifically why you might be viewing higher velocities obtained with that powder, in contrast to Everything you've observed with the IMR things. Also superior powder, but somewhat far better suited to a little smaller situations by using a little bit considerably less capability.
Minnesota H4831SC is my go to in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am conserving the minimal I have left for slide 2021. I might commence reduced and work your way up, depending on what load data you check out for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
Novice to reloading. This will likely be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable to get my arms on a couple kilos of h4831.
I am aware, tough occasions. H4831SC will definitely work, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded lengthy. I do not don't forget powder cost off the highest of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that is wherever I usually aim to generally be. As part of your scenario using what you have (and what I should have carried out) I'd personally start h4831 vs h4831sc with the end in the bearing surface area in the bullet appropriate at the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as soon as you look for a velocity node.
I don't love to work up a load applying a single large amount of powder after which you can have to work up once more mainly because I run out and have to begin employing a new whole lot amount.
In truth, It can be even a smart idea to back down and function up safely and securely when you go from a single ton to a different lots of precisely the same powder.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take full advantage of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Serious powder.
Confirm h4831 vs h4831sc YOUR AGE Selected states prohibit advertising or marketing of firearms, ammunition, and related firearm factors to minors. We’d like to ensure that you’re 18 many years of age or more mature in advance of letting you to buy our site. Are you presently eighteen a long time of age or more mature?
I've had very similar encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not shoot very well with just about anything besides Fed215's. Some elements just Do not Participate in properly with other. Appears like you've got picked out 3 superior powders, I might assume no less than one of them to shoot.
Immediately after reading through this information (and lots of Other folks, but this a single is considered the most data driven with multiple accredited shooters) I've stopped worrying about touching or getting inside of a magical distance with the lands, and started loading the place I could enhance multiple components of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you will get anything to work for ya.
I commonly generally receive the sc version. Employing a h4831sc load data powder measure it hangs up a lot less as a consequence of shorter kernels and I feel allows far more dependable metering so considerably less time you're taking trickling in the final little bit of charge to create weight. So in essence the SC saves you times
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have a very limited provide of Varget, in addition to a lot more readily available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Virtually completely, mainly because which is just what the rifles shoot the ideal.